![]() ![]() The second reason is perhaps counterintuitive, but hear me out: people like what they have. My initial instinct is to say no, for two reasons: even if costs come down over time, building something mechanical requires manufacturing precision and additional risk that will always add to the cost, making them more expensive than a typical metal-and-glass flagship today. And yet once those quirks are worked out - and they will be fixed in later versions, as the early idiosyncrasies of our current phones were in the early aughts - will needing to open our phones to use them dozens or hundreds of times a day justify the additional functionality they offer? From soft screen protectors to noisy hinges and a lack of water resistance, foldable phones cost more than the average smartphone while being completely impractical for the average person.Īnd yet. But not only that, the additional screen real estate of the Galaxy Fold, for instance, more than justifies the awkward salad days of the category's faults. My colleague and notable yacht fan, Michael Fisher, thinks that foldables have made everything else boring. ![]() Sounds obvious, of course, but there's a question of whether that built-in expansion is enough to justify the additional cost that come, and will likely continue to come, with buying a foldable phone. The question is whether foldables will ever shed their reputation for being less reliable than their more conventional counterparts. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |